Monday, October 18, 2004

One humanity, but two types of cloning

CommentandAnalysis&ao=123928" target=_blank>Unlike many topics at the
complex interface between science and politics, the key issues in the
cloning debate are relatively straightforward. Proponents of the use of
stem cells taken from human embryos argue that, in principle, these
could eventually be used as replacement human tissue in the treatment
of diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, as well as damage to
the central nervous system. Critics of the research argue that even
though the embryo from which the stem cells are taken has been
fertilised for less than 14 days -- and hence is still a bundle of
undifferentiated cells -- it should be considered a human being, with
full human rights.

posted by ryan griffis  # 3:53 PM

Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007  

syndicate [atom]

preBlog archives

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?