Friday, December 30, 2005

Review of Genetic Agriculture Thus Far

C|Net news has a review of biotech and agriculture that does a good job of pointing out many of the failures and problems with GE crops. It also does a lot of apologizing for the industry and speculates that, despite problems, GE agriculture will win over the world yet. It also makes a couple of misleading claims. One being that GE crops are only 10 years old this year. Ernest Jaworski genetically modified a tobacco and petunia plant to resist antibiotics for Monsanto in 1982. And although it wasn't introduced into the market, the first recombinant product wasn't a crop, but bovine somatotropin (Bst) for dairy cows in 1994. According to Monsanto's official records anyway. The other major misleading statement is that progress in GE crop consumption in the US is the result of consumer acceptance. According to the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, the average US consumer knows little about biotechnology and food, yet do express a desire for strong regulation of biotech and are especially weary of GE animals. The strategy of biotech companies like Monsanto has been to keep the public ill informed all along, and when necessary, develop a strong PR campaign that misleads people as to what is being done with GE.

posted by ryan griffis  # 9:47 AM

Comments: Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

Archives

June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007  

syndicate [atom]

preBlog archives

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?