The journal Nature recently ran some commentary from scientists in support of nanotech, warning that some serious risk assessment was needed, not to really find out any potential problems with nanotech for public health, but to give the appearance of such evaluations, so that the public won't lose confidence in governments and business, and let "the enormous potential of nanotechnology be squandered."
But much like the non-discourse on biotech agriculture, no one really wants the pubic involved in any decision making. Better just to convince us that someone's at least thinking of us.
June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007