According to a press release from the ETC Group:
Two World Bank projects, with funding from the GEF (Global Environmental Facility), propose to introduce genetically modified crops such as maize, potatoes, cassava, rice and cotton into five Latin American and four African countries that are centers of origin or diversity for these and other major food crops. Civil society organizations warn that DNA contamination from genetically modified crops poses an unacceptable risk to stable crops that are the basis of peasant economies in these regions. The multi-million dollar projects are being promoted under the guise of scientific biosafety research, but civil society organizations on both continents are calling for their immediate rejection because they threaten food sovereignty and farmer-controlled seed systems.
A while back, I posted on a story using the phrase fertility tourism... Here's another article discussing the phenomenon of the wealthy around the world flocking to the US in order to have designer babies. Mostly, the US is the nation of choice, not because of advanced science, but due to the lack of regulation. According to the article, these services are now advertised in airline magazines.
What a headline. And what was the fiscal manager's response to the potential similarities:
Another article in the Scientist, on the efforts to progress stem cell research... this particular line is quite interesting.
The public's lack of understanding of the science behind the research was highlighted during a talk by Stephen Levick, professor of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, on Sunday when he noted that Irv Weissman had recently asked several people to draw a picture of a blastocyst; each of the respondents drew a fetus.
I don't know that I could draw a blastocyst either. But it's interesting how much the image of the fetus figures into the discussions of stem cells.
The Scientist reports on a recent FDA authorization that permits in vitro testing without the patient's consent in the event of a public health emergency.
Of course, this puts women's bodies back in domain of legislation again. While many may find good arguments for the case of "public health" here, it's important contextualize this within the larger history of experimentation and subjugation of certain people's bodies.
June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007