Monday, April 30, 2007

Monsanto and Soybeans©

The European Patent office will be making a decision on Monsanto's European patent (No. 301-749) on all (yes, all) genetically modified soybeans on May 3. The decision is due to the 13 year legal battle against the patent by the ETC Group (formerly RAFI) and Greenpeace. The patent was originally awarded to another US biotech company, Agracetus in 1994, but that company was overtaken by Monsanto in 1996.
In 2005, reports indicated that Monsanto's engineered soybean represented close to 90% of globally planted soy. Monsanto is currently the largest seed company in the world.
The patent was already upheld in a 2003 hearing by the European Patent Office.

posted by ryan griffis  # 12:01 PM 0 comments links to this post

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Genetic Discrimination Coverage

Wired has covered the recent House Bill and some related threads, including some public polls stats.

posted by ryan griffis  # 1:52 PM 0 comments links to this post

More on the BP-University Biofuel Arrangement

The News Standard has an article on the BP agreements with UC Berkeley and the Univsersity of Illinois, Urbana-Chamapaign that has received some attention in Berkeley, but very little at UIUC. The agreement would form the Energy Biosciences Institute, which would be the largest climate-change research deal between universities and industry according to the article. UC Berkeley's Ignacio Chapela has been outspoken against the dangers of such agreements.

posted by ryan griffis  # 10:12 AM 0 comments links to this post

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Biotech Businesses and NIH Guidelines

I'm not completely sure what to make of this just yet, but the Sunshine Project has some data that points out that 18 of the top 20 biotech companies (excluding companies, like DuPont and Monsanto that are not exclusively biotech), don't comply with NIH guidelines. And apparently, the 2 that do comply only do so because they are required by legislation in the municipality in which they operate (Cambridge, MA).
On a similar note, the SP also broke news about a major breach of protocol at Texas A&M involving an infection of a lab worker exposed to a weaponized biological agent.

posted by ryan griffis  # 9:55 PM 0 comments links to this post

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Green Revolution 2.0?

The ETC Group released a report on 5 new programs that the group is labelling "Green Revolution 2.0" after the first Green Revolution following WWII that had such drastic impacts in India and across the globe. From their press release:
"While a comprehensive approach to African agriculture seems logical, ETC Group is concerned that all of the major initiatives are "top-down" exports from OECD countries. Nobody is talking to farmers or their organizations. The Canadian government, for example, is building a $30 million biotech research facility in Nairobi to pursue genetically modified crops. The request came from an international research network headquartered in Washington - not from Africans. Likewise, the Gates/Rockefeller AGRA initiative already has a detailed plan on how to spend its first $150 million but admits that it has yet to talk with African farmers' organizations. "

posted by ryan griffis  # 11:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Male Births Drop in US and Japan

Recent story in Wired about the drop in male births in the US and Japan points to some research from the Pittsburgh Cancer Institute's Center for Environmental Oncology. The research suggests a combination of environmental factors that are effecting genetic material pre-conception in males as well as in prenatal situations. The story mentions that males with high rates of exposure to solvents in the workplace conceive fewer male children.
Genetic engineering should be looked at as more expansive than just those activities that deliberately involve the direct manipulation of DNA, as the manipulation of a population's biology indirectly (like through the allowed exposure to toxins in the workplace) is equally an engineered situation. Positive eugenics (through tech like IVF) and negative eugenics (regulating reproduction of "undesirables") alike were always part of the program.

posted by ryan griffis  # 4:30 PM 0 comments links to this post

Archives

June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007  

syndicate [atom]

preBlog archives

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?