Monday, July 30, 2007

2 Small 2 Regulate

In an unsurprising move, the US FDA has ruled that products made with nanotechnology do not need special labeling. Just as in their decisions on genetically modified foods, the US government seems to think industry is better served if citizens consumers don't know what they are putting into and on their bodies and their surroundings.
Here is the FDA's official response to health and environmental concerns:
We believe we do not have scientific evidence about nano-sized materials posing safety questions that merit being mentioned on the label. (Dr. Randall Lutter, FDA's associate commissioner for policy and planning)
They believe? Do they have scientific evidence otherwise, that it does not pose safety questions?
The FDA is making a pretty good case for citizen review boards I must say. A little discussion around this flared up earlier in the month on a discussion list devoted to synthetic biology where a European study on implementing "participatory technology assessment" was referenced.

posted by ryan griffis  # 8:08 PM 0 comments links to this post

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Welcome Guest Bloggers!

We are lucky to have two new contributors, Jennifer Rutledge and Lisa Tucker.

Jennifer Rutledge is currently a PhD candidate and instructor in Political Science at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cites. Her research interests are Food politics, Politics of Children, International Development, Socio-political Change, International Organizations, Human Rights and International Law.

Lisa Tucker is an artist and organizer in Southern California. Lisa most recently organized a multidisciplinary series of events at the University of California, Irvine titled Food Bioneering: Hybrid Investigations of Food.

Thanks Jennifer and Lisa, and welcome!

posted by ryan griffis  # 8:21 AM 0 comments links to this post

Monday, July 16, 2007

Ethanol and GMOs

Much of the criticism of ethanol has focused on the exorbitant amount of water and oil needed to produce ethanol, the continued mono-cropping of US farmland, and the subsequent rising cost of food. What has been less widely criticized is the rise in genetically modified corn that ethanol production will create. Currently 61 percent of the US corn crop is genetically modified and that number grows every year. The increase in corn production demanded by ethanol production will result in an automatic increase in genetically modified corn being planted.

In addition, companies are working to create genetically modified strains of corn that will be most readily converted into ethanol, largely by increasing the starch content of the corn. For instance, Monsanto and Cargill are working together and have formed Renessen, a biotechnology and processing company. Renessen has created MAVERA corn, a corn high in starch, that can only be processed in a specific processing plant, owned by Renessen. In addition, if a farmer wishes to sell corn to Renessen, she/he will have to purchase the seed from Renessen since the Renessen processing plant can only process Renessen corn. Thus, the closed loop of corporate control that GM food creates is yet again on display.

posted by Jennifer  # 2:00 PM 1 comments links to this post

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Science Jury Duty?

Wired recently ran an opinion piece on the notion of public hearings on scientific research, which of course received some very critical comments from scientists and others referring to "ignorant masses." A short and unsurprising discussion, but worth a read anyway.

posted by ryan griffis  # 11:41 AM 0 comments links to this post

DNA and the Ethics of Ownership

The Genetics and Public Policy Center, has organized a panel on the topic of genomics and patent law where experts will address such questions as:

2:00 p.m. EDT Tuesday, July 10, 2007

National Press Club

529 14th Street, N.W. -- 13th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20045

The Center is based at Johns Hopkins and is supported by the The Pew Charitable Trusts and by research funding from the National Human Genome Research Institute. The panel is also co-sponsored by the Duke University Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy.
While the questions posed and goals stated seem promising and certainly worthy of debate and discussion, the last 3 questions kind of assume the answer to the first, key question.

If anyone reading this attends, please let us know or post a comment as to reactions.

posted by ryan griffis  # 10:06 AM 0 comments links to this post

Monday, July 02, 2007

Monsanto's Profit Round Up

Much as in the 2001 case of Percy Schmeiser, a Canadian federal court has ruled that a farmer must pay Monsanto for damages incurred through the "illegal" use of their patented Round-Up Ready Soybean, i.e. not paying the licensing fees required by the company. In this case, the farmer is Ontario farmer Edward Wouters, of Northspruce Farms Ltd. The judgment was for $107,000.
In a not-unrelated story, Monsanto reported a 71% rise in profits, mostly due to an increase in corn planted in the US - claimed to be the most corn planted since WWII. And with Monsanto reportedly holding 33% of the US corn seed market and their 25% increase in prices for Round Up Ready Corn.

posted by ryan griffis  # 5:11 PM 0 comments links to this post

Adam Zaretsky, on video

You can see bio-artist and educator Adam Zaretsky on video leading workshops, giving lectures and discussing genetics, ethics and art on Google video.

posted by ryan griffis  # 4:57 PM 0 comments links to this post

Synthia v Dolly in a race for the border

This week (July 2 - 6) in Paris, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity's scientific subcommittee is meeting to discuss climate change and the role synthetic biology might play in potential solutions for renewable energy. This meeting follows closely on the heels of the announcement, in a report, by J. Craig Venter and co from Synthetic Genomics Inc, that they had replaced the DNA of one bacterium into another - effectively creating an entirely new species. One, not-so-obvious question for those non-specialists among us following these developments is how synthetic organisms will fit into the current legal and regulatory framework. The ETC Group for example asks if the global movements of such organisms will be governed by the Cartagena Protocol - the treaty on transboundary movements of GMOs.
Oh, and Synthia was the oh-so-clever name given to the synthetic microbe being developed by Synthetic Genomics.
You can hear Venter discuss this research on NPR's Science Friday.

posted by ryan griffis  # 4:30 PM 0 comments links to this post


June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007  

syndicate [atom]

preBlog archives

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?